1. Ahrentzen, S. (1986). If I can’t change my
home, I’ll just change my mind. EDRA 17, 137-134.
2. Ahrentzen, S., Levine, D. & Michelson, W.
(1989). Space, time and activity in the
home: A gender analysis. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 9(1), 89-101.
3. Altman, I. & Churchman, A. (Eds)
(1994). Women and the environment.
4. Booth, C. (2001). Gender-aware
approaches to local and regional developments. Town Planning Review, 72 (2),
217-242
5. Booth, C., Darke, J. & Yeandle, S.
(1996). Changing places: Women’s lives in the city.
6. Boys, J
(1984). Making space. Women and the man made environment.
7. Churchman, A. (1999). Women and the
Environment: Questioned and Unquestioned Assumptions.
8. Churchman, A. & Sebba, R. (1985). Women's territoriality in the home. In Safir, M., Mednick, M., Israeli, D.
Bernard, J. (Eds). Women's Worlds.
N.Y.: Praeger.
9. Day, K. (1999). Embassies and sanctuaries:
Women’s experience of race and fear in public space. Environment and
Planning D, 17, 307-328.
10. Day, K. (1999). Introducing gender to the
critique of privatized public space. Journal of Urban design, 4(2),
155-178.
11. Day, K. (2000). The ethic of care and women’s
experiences of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20 (2,
103-124.
12. Design Book Review (1992). Gender and design. 25 (summer) 7-45.
13. Fox, M. (1985). Access to workplaces for women: New community
designs in the
14. Franck, K. & Paxson, L. (1989). Women and urban public space: Research,
design and policy issues. In I.
Altman &
15. Hasell, M. & Peatross, F. (1990). Exploring connections between women's
changing roles and house forms. Environment
& Behavior, 22(1), 3-26.
16. Hayden, D. (1981). What would a non-sexist city look like: In Women and the American city.
17. Hays, P. & Zouari, J. (1995). Stress,
coping and mental health among rural, village and urban women in
18. Journal of Architectural and Planning
Research (1992) 9(2). Special
issue: Women's voices in architecture and planning.
19. Klodawsky, F. & Lundy, C. (1994). Women's safety in the university
environment. Journal of Architectural
& Planning Research, 11(2), 128-136.
20. Mazumdar, S. & Mazumdar, S. (1994). Societal values and architecture: A
socio-physical model of the interrelationships. Journal of Architectural & Planning
Research, 11(1),
67-90.
21. Mazundar, S. & Mazumdar, S. (2001).
Rethinking public and private space: Religion and women in Muslim society. Journal
of Architectural and Planning Research, 18 (4), 302-324.
22. Milroy, B. (1991). Taking stock of planning,
space and gender. Journal of Planning Literature, 6(1), 3-15.
23. Moser, C. & Peake, L. (Eds.) (1987). Women, human settlements, and housing.
24. Oc, T. & Tiesdell, S. (1997). Safer
city centres, reviving the public realm.
25. Pothukuchi, K. (2003) Working women’s hostels
in
26. Trench, S., Oc, T. & Tiesdell, S. (1992).
Safer cities for women-perceived risks and planning measures. Town Planning
Review, 63 (3), 279-296.
27. Weisman, L. (1992). Discrimination by
design.
28. Wekerle, G. (1981). Women in the urban environment. In Women and the
29. Wekerle, G., Peterson, R. & Morley, D.
(Eds.) (1980). New space for women.
30. Wekerle, G. & Whitzman, C. (1995). Safe
cities. N.Y.: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
1.
Baum, H. (1999).
Community organizations recruiting community participation: Predicaments in
planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18 (3), 187-199.
2.
Berkeley, N. et
al. (1995). Involving the community in plan preparation. Community
Development Journal, 30 (2), 189-199.
3.
Buchecker, M.,
Hunzucker, M. & Kiensat, F. (2003). Participatory landscape development:
Overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape and Urban
Planning, 64 (1), 29-46.
4.
Churchman, A.
(1987). Can resident participation in neighborhood rehabilitation programs succeed:
5.
Churchman, A.
(1988). Issues in resident participation
- lessons from the Israeli experience. Policy
Studies Journal, 16)2(, 290-299.
6.
7.
Desai, V. (1994).
Aspects of community participation within low-income housing. Review of
Urban and Regional Development Studies, 6, 167-191.
8.
Hibbard, M. &
Lurie, S. (2000). Saving land but losing ground. Challenges to community
planning in the era of participation. Journal of Planning Education and
Research, 20, 187-195.
9.
Leavitt, J. &
Saegert, S. (1988). The community-household: Responding to housing abandonment
in
10.
Schneekloth, L.
and Shibley, R. (1995). Placemaking. The art and practice of building
communities.
11.
Schuman, T.
(1987). Participation, empowerment & urbanism: Design and politics in the revitalization of French
social housing. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 4
(4), 349-359.
12.
Schwartz, A.
(2000). Public parks, private partners: How partnerships are revitalizing
urban parks.
1.
Andrew, C.
(1995). Getting women’s issues on the municipal agenda: Violence against women.
In J. Garber & R. Turner (Eds.). Gender in urban research.
2.
3.
Beall, J.
Participation in the city: A gender perspective.
4.
Feldman, R.M.
& Stall, S. (1994). The politics of space appropriation: A case study of
women's struggles for homeplace in
5.
Franck, K. &
Ahrentzen, S. (1989). New households, new housing. N.Y.: Van Nostrand
Reinhold.
6.
Horelli, L.
(2003). The network approach to urban planning and sustainable development-
women’s experiences of place based politics.
7.
Nagar, R. &
Ragie, S. (2003). Women, NGOs and the contradictions of empowerment and
disempowerment. A conversation. Antipode, 1-13.
8.
Rahder, B.
(1999). Victims no longer: Participatory planning with a diversity of women at
risk of abuse. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18, 221-232.
9.
Saegert, S.
(1989). Unlikely leaders, extreme circumstances: Older black women building
community households. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17,
295-316.