Course Description
PURPOSE
Planners need many skills. They need technical and analytic training, which you have been receiving from your other courses. But they also need to know how to apply those skills. This is the purpose of a workshop course: to learn by doing. The emphasis of this course is on doing. There will be only a few reading assignments. This course will try to push you out of the classroom, both in spirit and in reality.
The central theme of UP 347 is local planning practice. This
will include tangible skills such as plan preparation, mapping, land
use analysis, and writing memoranda. In addition, the course will
introduce you to the bureaucratic and political contexts of planning
practice. We
will find out what planners do and how they spend their workday, begin
to appreciate all the players involved in planning decisions, and learn
how planners have to think creatively to accomplish their goals. We
will also develop skills in physical planning, relating to both
the built and natural environments. This is an important aspect of
land use planning practice, and it is not covered by any of your other
urban planning courses.
This course has two primary goals:
- To introduce you to the day-to-day realities of the practice of planning, and improve your understanding of how planning works.
- To teach you a variety of skills, in field research and physical planning, to better prepare you for your Senior workshop.
The course has three components:
- The profession of planning
- Urban land uses and urban design
- Natural environmental factors in planning
COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND GRADING
Your participation is crucial in a course of this type. You are expected to attend every class, and we will take attendance at the beginning of class. Some days will consist of three hours of lecture. Other days will be workshop days, in which you will be free to work on your projects in class, meet with your groups, or perform field data collection. Some days will be a mix of both. Some days will require all three hours, whereas others will require less time. You will be expected to be available for all three hours of scheduled class time, unless you clear it ahead of time with the instructor.
This course has six hours of credit. This is equivalent
to two three-hour courses.
Assignments
The course will have many diverse assignments, some done individually and others done in groups. . Most
of the work will be in three large, multi-part projects, plus a smaller
fourth project. In addition, three ”tasks” require
student participation and reflection. The final exam will be
an additional way to ensure that all students in the class have gained
substantively from the course.
Project #1 -- The Profession of Planning. This will
consist of three parts. For the first part (“What
Planners Do”), each student will read and report on one entire
issue of Planning magazine, and we will then share our
observations in class on the breadth of planning practice. For
the second part (“Interviews with Planners”), individuals
or pairs of students will interview a practicing planner in the
Champaign-Urbana area, in order to learn about specific job duties
as well as career paths. For the third part (“Careers in
Planning”), each student will use the internet to explore
career possibilities.
Project #2 – Urban Design. In this project, students
will analyze the function and design of existing sites in Champaign-Urbana,
evaluate the relationship of the sites to surrounding areas, and
ponder future land use changes. This project will also include lessons
on map scale and area calculations.
Project #3 – Environmental Planning in Champaign County.
This project will consist of a series of exercises using Champaign
County to explore issues in environmental planning: woodlands, streams,
and effects of development. The project will include lessons
on GIS, topography, and hydrology.
Project #4 –Subdivision site Design. Small teams
will prepare schematic plans and illustrative details for a development
on a site previously analyzed in Project #3.
Task #1 -- Plans. In one class session, groups
of students will examine examples of local land use plans, and will
report to the class.
Task #2 -- Planning Ethics. In one class session,
groups of students will review and discuss case studies of difficult
planning situations. Each individual will turn in a brief summary.
Task #3 – Planning Meetings. Each
student will select a combination of public planning meetings, professional
planning lectures, or planning conference to attend.
Final exam. The final exam will consist of brief essays
and short answer questions, designed to integrate what you learned
this semester. Emphasis will be placed on the reading assignments,
lectures, and specific skills learned from the projects.
Assigned Readings
This course includes a limited amount of assigned readings, designed
to provide background information and ideas to help you with the class
projects. Most of the readings will be available on e-reserve on the
UIUC Library website shortly after the first week of the semester. Some
readings may be distributed in class.
You are expected to complete readings prior to the class session for which they are assigned.
All the course readings are as follows:
American Planning Association. 2006. Planning and
Urban Design Standards. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken NJ.
pp. 107-121, watersheds, groundwater, streams, riparian vegetation
pp. 125-129, wetlands
pp. 336-344, stormwater management
Jacobs, Allan, 1985. Looking at Cities. Harvard University Press.
Chapter 3 -- Clues
Chapter 5 – Seeing Change
Hoch, Charles J., Dalton, Linda C., and So, Frank S., eds. 2000. The
Practice of Local Government Planning, Third Edition, International
City/County Management Association, Washington, D.C.
Chapter 14, Zoning and Subdivision Regulations, pp. 343-374.
Strahler, A.N., and Strahler, A.H., 1987, Modern Physical Geography, Third Edition, John Wiley and Sons. pp. 478-487.
Grading
The assignments for the semester will total up to 1000 points. At the end of the semester, course grades will be assigned based on a curve of the distribution of point totals. Following is the contribution of each assignment toward your final grade:
| Project #1 – The Profession
of Planning |
|
200
|
| |
1-1 What planners do (100)
1-2 Interviews with planners (50)
1-3 Careers in planning (50) |
|
|
| Project #2 – Urban Design |
|
150
|
| |
2-1 Looking at the built environment
2-2 Working with maps
2-3 Analyzing size and density
2-4 Site observation |
|
|
| Project #3 – Environmental Planning |
|
150 |
| |
3-1 Land cover analysis of Champaign County
3-2 Topography and watersheds
3-3 Environmental review |
|
|
| Project #4 – Subdivision Site
Design |
|
100 |
| Exam |
|
100
|
| Body of work on 3 tasks |
|
100 |
| |
Task #1 -- Plans |
|
|
| |
Task #2 -- Planning Ethics |
|
|
| |
Task #3 –- Planning Institute |
|
|
| Attendance (150) and participation (50) |
|
200 |
Late Assignments
Late assignments will be penalized 10% of the project’s point total per week overdue. If you are absent for one of the in-class Tasks (#1 and #2), you will need to make it up by arranging with the instructor to prepare a brief report (approximately five pages) on the topic.
Attendance and Participation
Your grade for attendance and participation will be governed primarily by attendance. Absences, not excused prior to class, will cause a loss of 15 points, and excessive lateness will cause a loss of 5 points each. Up to two excused absences will not result in loss of points; additional excused absences will cause a loss of 10 points each. In addition, active participation over the course of the semester will improve your participation grade.
Grading Standards
| |
90+% |
outstanding performance, exceeds expectations for the assignment, minor errors do not affect overall product |
| |
80-90% |
good performance, meets expectations for assignment, minor mistakes may affect some aspects of the product, technically and conceptually correct |
| |
70-80% |
fair performance, does not fully meet all expectations for assignment, several technical errors, concept is evident but flawed, solution only minimally satisfies requirements of the problem |
| |
50-70% |
poor performance, barely meets expectations for assignment, reflects lack of understanding for the requirements of the problem, serious conceptual and technical errors |
| |
<50% |
failure, does not meet expectations for assignment, unacceptable submission |
These grading standards do not apply to the three Tasks. For these, you need only complete them satisfactorily and on time in order to receive all 100 points. Conversely, not completing them could severely affect your semester grade.
If you work hard and submit work of acceptable quality, you can expect a B in the course. If you do not work hard and do not meet course expectations regarding performance and participation, you can expect a C or less. Work of exceptional quality will earn an A.
Office Hours
Please feel free to see us during our office hours! You can come for help on the current assignment, or to discuss grades, problems with team coordination, or career advice. We encourage you to email us at any time.
Rob Olshansky – Wednesday 1:00-4:00pm.
(make appointment via e-mail to guarantee a time)
Room 111 Buell Hall
phone 333-8703, e-mail robo@uiuc.edu
Vineeta Mathur – hours and office to be announced
e-mail, vmathur2@uiuc.edu
Download PDF of Syllabus
|